KREX Weather
Grand Junction
Montrose
Glenwood Springs
Grand Junction
65.0 °
Montrose
65.0 °
Glenwood Springs
54.0 °
Weighing in on Measure 5B: Mosquito Control Tax by
KREX News Room
|
This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled.
Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
|


You have indicated this comment should be removed.
The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .
Anonymous said on Friday, Oct 5 at 12:46 PM
Amusing to see some of the responses. You ignorant citizens getting all worked up should save yourselves some anger....every time we have locally voted down a new or increase in taxes, our wishes have been ignored. It will happen again. We coul just stop this gradual slide to fascism and sign our checks directly to the gov, and see if they let us have any back. This new agency will soon grow to behemoth proportions and take an ever increasing allocation of your money. The real question is: at what point will they deem it necessary to arm themselves with billions of rounds of hollow points like the social security admin and the national weather service?
Naturalist said on Friday, Oct 5 at 9:44 AM
What? Are you friggin kidding me? Buy More Bats!!!! This will eliminate the mosquitoes naturally!!
Upset at UTE Water said on Friday, Oct 5 at 9:42 AM
Concerned has it right- UTE Water built a new building and then has raised out water rated 30% without our consent. Their employees now live in a new spacious office and drive newer trucks than everybody else. They are living in the lap of luxury while the rest of us face the Great Recession.
Hearing Attender said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:45 AM
The Mosquito Control Board meeting I attended last Sept. 18, supposedly for those who "have questions or concerns about the inclusion," was a sham--apparently to meet minimum legal standards for public notice while flying this proposal under the public's radar and avoiding and blocking all public comment. What irks me even more than the tax increase are the dirty tricks being used to sneak this through. E.g., at what was supposedly an informational meeting about what was going on, it was announced that the deadline for complaining was the day before. Contrary to their claims, this deadline was NOT advertized on the mailing which was sent out. (I'm looking at my copy right now.) It looks to me like this is mostly about optimizing the boundaries to pick up high-dollar property tax payers (like the Southeast Redlands) rather than potential mosquito breeding grounds.
Healthy? said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:36 AM
The chemicals used by the GRMCD (according to their web site) may be "much healthier and more environmentally friendly", but they are still chemicals! All of them come with health warnings (such as flushing the skin for 30 minutes on exposure, wearing protective clothing and masks). I'm sure I don't want this stuff in the hay fields around the valley - hay that will be fed to cattle that will show up on my dinner plate.
Confused said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:04 AM
If residents of 'the north area' are the ones showing interest in being included in the district, why are residents in the Redlands (where there are no irrigated fields or pools of standing water where the chemicals would be deposited) being included in the new property tax hike?
Registered Voter said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:02 AM
Tax, is a tax, is a TAX ! No way in hell, will I ever vote myself, another "TAX" !
Concerned said on Friday, Oct 5 at 7:12 AM
Why hasn't the Grand River Mosquito Control District informed the voters their plans for a new expensive building in Grnad Junction. Seems they need the additional money for themselves rather than the citizens of Grand Junction and Mesa County.
Add a comment
Most Popular