Tools

Weighing in on Measure 5B: Mosquito Control Tax

by KREX News Room
by Cori Coffin

GRAND JUNCTION, Colo.- An item has made it to Grand Junction's local ballots that could raise property taxes. Measure 5B affects both residents and businesses.

People may not have heard about the measure, but if it passes, it could affect residents in two ways.

First, the measure could provide some protection against the West Nile virus, which has seen 11 cases in Mesa County and at least two deaths in Montrose.

"The percentage of mosquitoes that we saw this summer that were of the species that spread West Nile or spread disease were much higher than normal," explained Zane McCallister, district manager for the Grand River Mosquito Control District.

However, the measure will also raise property taxes for both residents and businesses.

"There's been enough interest in the north area and in Grand Junction for the Mosquito Control to consider putting it on the ballot again," said McCallister.

Measure 5B would bring the metro Grand Junction area in with other districts like Palisade, Orchard Mesa, the Redlands and Fruita, which already receive mosquito mitigation.

Around 23,000 households would be affected.

Residents like Sandra Parker and her husband don't feel that the added cost burden would be worth it for Grand Junction households.

"For every $100,000 of property that's assessed, their taxes will raise $12.04. This is a never-ending tax," she said.

Businesses will also be impacted. In Colorado, a property tax on businesses is about four-times as much as the residential rate.

For every $100,000 the business's property is worth, it amounts to $43.88 in fees.

The business owners who NewsChannel 5 spoke to didn't know a lot about the measure, but say they are concerned about their taxes going up in general.

However, the Mosquito Control District has no control over how the fees are assessed.

"We feel for the business owners and we're not trying to hurt them. The state laws are set up the way the state laws are set up," McCallister added.

He went on to say that the tax rate battle is something fought at the state level rather than in this local election.

Still, some residents have health concerns about the spray.

However, McCallister explained that modern techniques are much healthier and more environmentally friendly than in the past, when a fog of spray would blanket entire streets.

Despite the advancements, Parker feels the tax should not be mandatory. "As a city we need to stick together. As individuals, you know, you get tired of government telling you what to do," she said.

The Grand River Mosquito Control District says the fee benefits the greater good, but it is still the voter's choice.

The measure heads to the ballot in November.

To find out more about 5B, head to the Grand Junction Chamber of Commerce's Voter Guide or visit the Grand River Mosquito Control District's website at www.grmcd.net .

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Concerned said on Friday, Oct 5 at 7:12 AM

Why hasn't the Grand River Mosquito Control District informed the voters their plans for a new expensive building in Grnad Junction. Seems they need the additional money for themselves rather than the citizens of Grand Junction and Mesa County.

Registered Voter said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:02 AM

Tax, is a tax, is a TAX ! No way in hell, will I ever vote myself, another "TAX" !

Confused said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:04 AM

If residents of 'the north area' are the ones showing interest in being included in the district, why are residents in the Redlands (where there are no irrigated fields or pools of standing water where the chemicals would be deposited) being included in the new property tax hike?

Healthy? said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:36 AM

The chemicals used by the GRMCD (according to their web site) may be "much healthier and more environmentally friendly", but they are still chemicals! All of them come with health warnings (such as flushing the skin for 30 minutes on exposure, wearing protective clothing and masks). I'm sure I don't want this stuff in the hay fields around the valley - hay that will be fed to cattle that will show up on my dinner plate.

Hearing Attender said on Friday, Oct 5 at 8:45 AM

The Mosquito Control Board meeting I attended last Sept. 18, supposedly for those who "have questions or concerns about the inclusion," was a sham--apparently to meet minimum legal standards for public notice while flying this proposal under the public's radar and avoiding and blocking all public comment. What irks me even more than the tax increase are the dirty tricks being used to sneak this through. E.g., at what was supposedly an informational meeting about what was going on, it was announced that the deadline for complaining was the day before. Contrary to their claims, this deadline was NOT advertized on the mailing which was sent out. (I'm looking at my copy right now.) It looks to me like this is mostly about optimizing the boundaries to pick up high-dollar property tax payers (like the Southeast Redlands) rather than potential mosquito breeding grounds.

Upset at UTE Water said on Friday, Oct 5 at 9:42 AM

Concerned has it right- UTE Water built a new building and then has raised out water rated 30% without our consent. Their employees now live in a new spacious office and drive newer trucks than everybody else. They are living in the lap of luxury while the rest of us face the Great Recession.

Naturalist said on Friday, Oct 5 at 9:44 AM

What? Are you friggin kidding me? Buy More Bats!!!! This will eliminate the mosquitoes naturally!!

Anonymous said on Friday, Oct 5 at 12:46 PM

Amusing to see some of the responses. You ignorant citizens getting all worked up should save yourselves some anger....every time we have locally voted down a new or increase in taxes, our wishes have been ignored. It will happen again. We coul just stop this gradual slide to fascism and sign our checks directly to the gov, and see if they let us have any back. This new agency will soon grow to behemoth proportions and take an ever increasing allocation of your money. The real question is: at what point will they deem it necessary to arm themselves with billions of rounds of hollow points like the social security admin and the national weather service?

Add a comment

Name:

Comment: 1000 Characters Left

KREX - News, Weather, Sports for Grand Junction | Montrose | Glenwood Springs - Coverage You Can Count On and its affiliated companies are not responsible for the content of comments posted or for anything arising out of use of the above comments or other interaction among the users. We reserve the right to screen, refuse to post, remove or edit user-generated content at any time and for any or no reason in our absolute and sole discretion without prior notice, although we have no duty to do so or to monitor any Public Forum.

Most Popular

This content requires the latest Adobe Flash Player and a browser with JavaScript enabled. Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.
News Channel 5 Weather